Genesis
At the Crossroads of Multiple Histories
The Problem of Incomplete Narratives
Project Avalon responds to a triple frustration:
The reductive Western vision: The history of AI told only through Dartmouth (1956) and Turing (1950) renders invisible centuries of contributions from other cultures and eras.
Inaccessible complexity: Works like those of Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler (Calculating Empires) do trace back to 1500, but their dense infographic format makes it difficult for non-expert audiences to engage with. Their timeline, while brilliant, can be overwhelming.
The absence of a popular narrative: Between academic textbooks and press articles focused on immediate news, there was a missing format—one that is accessible, narrative-driven, and that allows readers to understand how and why AI fits into a millennia-old human history.
The Project's Central Thesis
History-AI rests on a simple but radical proposition: artificial intelligence is not a recent phenomenon, but the continuation of humanity's millennia-old quest to automate thought and encode intelligence into matter.
This expanded definition allows us to:
- Trace back to antiquity (Hero of Alexandria's automata, divination mechanisms)
- Include non-Western contributions (Al-Jazari, African numeral systems)
- Understand cycles of innovation and forgetting linked to wars, conquests, and library destructions
Editorial Positioning
The project deliberately positions itself in the field of popular science education:
- Language: French first (then English)
- Audience: Curious readers without technical background
- Length: Articles of ~1,500 words (long-form format, counterintuitive in the age of short attention spans)
- Style: Narrative, with extended metaphors
- Approach: Historical rigor with maximum accessibility
Conceptual Architecture
To tell the story of AI over two millennia, we had to accept that it sits at the intersection of four distinct histories:
- History of computing
- History of information
- History of technology
- General history
This interdisciplinary approach involves:
- Cross-referencing sources from the history of science, political history, and the history of technology
- Contextualizing each innovation within its era (wars, conquests, cultural exchanges)
- Identifying moments of rupture, acceleration, and forgetting